<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Falcon Wind Turbine:  Versatile &#038; Efficient Power Generation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html</link>
	<description>Efficient things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alternative Profits		</title>
		<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/comment-page-1#comment-72512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alternative Profits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://metaefficient.com/?p=3510#comment-72512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds good. The problem is, I come across too many wind turbine designs these days each claiming pretty much the same benefits - more modular, more efficient and so on. I think the key issue is price - how much does this cost? Remember, wind turbines go at around $1-1.5 million per MW, so this has to fall in that range for it to be competitive.

And as ThisIsNo has said before, perhaps it can work at lower wind speeds, but somewhere it&#039;s gonna hit you...no free lunch.

Some thoughts from the Alternative Profits - http://www.altprofits.com/ref/report/report.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good. The problem is, I come across too many wind turbine designs these days each claiming pretty much the same benefits &#8211; more modular, more efficient and so on. I think the key issue is price &#8211; how much does this cost? Remember, wind turbines go at around $1-1.5 million per MW, so this has to fall in that range for it to be competitive.</p>
<p>And as ThisIsNo has said before, perhaps it can work at lower wind speeds, but somewhere it&#8217;s gonna hit you&#8230;no free lunch.</p>
<p>Some thoughts from the Alternative Profits &#8211; <a href="http://www.altprofits.com/ref/report/report.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.altprofits.com/ref/report/report.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ThisIsNo		</title>
		<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/comment-page-1#comment-69911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThisIsNo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://metaefficient.com/?p=3510#comment-69911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only problem is that with a 1.5 mph (.671 m/s) wind, you&#039;d need 330+ square meters of rotor area to power a 60W light bulb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem is that with a 1.5 mph (.671 m/s) wind, you&#8217;d need 330+ square meters of rotor area to power a 60W light bulb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brivari		</title>
		<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/comment-page-1#comment-67759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brivari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://metaefficient.com/?p=3510#comment-67759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that 1.5MPH is a mistranslation, their documentation shows speeds in terms of meters per second.  Their English spec sheet lists &#039;kick in&#039; speeds of 2m/s and cut-out speeds of 14m/s. That translates roughly to 4MPH and 30MPH. 
http://www.loopwing.co.jp/en/01wind/022850_02.html
Theirs are cute, but the performance is similar to SW Windpower traditional micro-turbines.
http://www.windenergy.com/products/products.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that 1.5MPH is a mistranslation, their documentation shows speeds in terms of meters per second.  Their English spec sheet lists &#8216;kick in&#8217; speeds of 2m/s and cut-out speeds of 14m/s. That translates roughly to 4MPH and 30MPH.<br />
<a href="http://www.loopwing.co.jp/en/01wind/022850_02.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.loopwing.co.jp/en/01wind/022850_02.html</a><br />
Theirs are cute, but the performance is similar to SW Windpower traditional micro-turbines.<br />
<a href="http://www.windenergy.com/products/products.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.windenergy.com/products/products.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EfficiencySeeker		</title>
		<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/comment-page-1#comment-67723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EfficiencySeeker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://metaefficient.com/?p=3510#comment-67723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brivari, check out the other wind power articles on the site, such as this one: 
https://metaefficient.com/renewable-power/loopwing-wind-turbine-at-japanese-tradeshow.html
It says that it only need 1.5 MPH wind to start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brivari, check out the other wind power articles on the site, such as this one:<br />
<a href="https://metaefficient.com/renewable-power/loopwing-wind-turbine-at-japanese-tradeshow.html" rel="ugc">https://metaefficient.com/renewable-power/loopwing-wind-turbine-at-japanese-tradeshow.html</a><br />
It says that it only need 1.5 MPH wind to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brivari		</title>
		<link>https://metaefficient.com/uncategorized/falcon-wind-turbine-versatile-efficient-power-generation.html/comment-page-1#comment-67503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brivari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://metaefficient.com/?p=3510#comment-67503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t micro-turbines that eliminate the grid more meta-effecient than ones like this that continue the megacorp delivered power?

I&#039;d LOVE to find one that kicks in below 7MPH and doesn&#039;t throttle down above 30!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t micro-turbines that eliminate the grid more meta-effecient than ones like this that continue the megacorp delivered power?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d LOVE to find one that kicks in below 7MPH and doesn&#8217;t throttle down above 30!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: metaefficient.com @ 2026-08-08 01:22:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->